Skip to main content

India - A declared democracy within an undeclared emergency.

(cartoon credits : Sajith Kumar )

People who have lived their prime through the 1970s perhaps wouldn't need much new knowledge on what and how the emergency period was. The darkest era of democracy as someone once said and I quoted in a previous article. The similarities between the Indira government and the Modi government was pointed out in various ways and by various authors around the globe. The question of are we in a state of emergency today is indeed something that would make one hesitant to say no. Thanks to outrages among the citizens for their basic rights. If that sentence smelt like there was a tad pinch of annoyance in it, you weren't wrong. But this is not my point of view, it's the government's.

Ever since 2014 to the present, the graph of conviction in sedition cases have gone uphil in a quicker pace, compared to those convicted in murders, rapes, human trafficking and much more. Maybe the pandemic graph is the only one that could be put on a race with that. From 8th November 2016 to 16th February 2021, we have had atleast 3 huge protests against the government that has grabbed global attention. India slipped down in world democracy index, press freedom index, safety for women ranking, economy etc. But what kept rising was the unemployment rate, internet shut downs, riots, vigilantism, sedition charges and ofcourse, the deaths of thousands gasping for breath.

But the question asked was whether India is in a state of emergency? And do these facts provide an answer to that? No. These facts only provide the foundation stone for an emergency situation like before. The foundation consists of dissent, free speech and the right to live with dignity. Emergency is simply the demolition of that foundation. Or perhaps it's not. I welcome a dissent to that opinion of mine. Dissent is the most beautiful thing in a democracy. Because dissent, makes us all human in nature. It tells one that it is okay to not like something. It tells one that it is okay to talk about things you don't like. But who decides what differentiates one's likeness and one's hatred is another question that needs to be answered. 

To answer that question, we need to get to another question. How independent are we? Are we really away from the British Raj? To those in the echoes of 'yes' perhaps hasn't come down to the facts yet. Our law books still contains close to 3/4th of it's provisions those were made by the British. Even though we have repealed many of them, the thoughts planted by them into an average Indian's mind has moved down the lineage.

The sedition law was made in favour of the queen and later, the same was added to the Indian law system during the colonial era of the nation. It was made to silence the "woke" citizens of the land. Citizens who wanted to speak for the independence of this great nation. They were silenced, suppressed and slammed with sedition charges. Even as time passed sedition laws remains to be a part of the Indian penal code as section 124-A. The very same law that was brought to the land for the suppression of the nation's voices for freedom, was still held onto even after gaining the freedom. Funny thing is, the very British who brought the law into India, repealed it in their country during 2009 whereas we still hold on to it. 

Today sedition law in India is one of the most charged laws on activists of all fields as long as they have made a gesture or word that criticized the government. From Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi to a 21 year old activists, the law has been used to silence the voice and not the noise. 

How independent are we? When we still hold on to the laws given to us by the British which were used to suppress us. What difference does it make when the motive remained the same but only the person has changed? How are we not in an emergency if there is no humour sense but definitely humour censored. How are we free to speak when we have to pay a price for it? 

"If he was never charged with sedition, if he never went to prison, if he never had to fight for it, he would have never been known to us as Mahatma."


Comments

  1. Well annoted of the glass cage of freedom. U can talk, see, sense but never really feel 🤗

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The fastest growing economy & The GDP : A gaslighted story?

For decades, the various governments of both the state and centre have been at war against the other pointing out the GDP growth being less or more during the respective regimes according to the whims and needs of that particular political agenda. The states whether in opposition or not, claim to be a huge contributor towards the GDP and the center seems to glorify itself as the 'Messiah' of the country's economy by making it the fastest growing economy in the world. The honorable finance minister Mrs. Nirmala Sitharaman in her parliament speeches have spectacularly mentioned about the country's growing GDP rates and have praised the Prime Minister and his 'vision' to be not one, but many steps ahead of what the UPA could have ever achieved. In a reply to the same, the former finance minister Mr. P. Chidambaram countered these claims by stating that the growth was in fact higher during the UPA rule. Thus began constant to and fro debates on which regime has brou...

Democracy, Protest and the Masterstroke

  "Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state has become lawless or corrupt." - Mahatma Gandhi In a historic turn of events, the unimaginable happened. The controversial farm laws that were passed in perhaps the most controversial fashion have been promised to be repealed in the next parliament session by the very government that seemed the most stubborn to not do so. For over a year, the farmers mainly from the states of Punjab, Haryana and Bihar have been protesting at the borders of the capital state Delhi demanding the same and their voice finally seems to have been echoing through the walls of the authorities. Or at least, we have been made to believe so. How did a government as stubborn as the present one decide to come down to its knees especially at a time when the protests have moved down to small sized columns from the front pages is one of those questions that have been missed amidst the rush of mittai distribution of victory. While writers, journalist...

Education, Handwritten Assignments & a changing Constitution

"Change is the only constant" While the world paces towards the new era of technology, or in a situation where it's there already, institutions parting education seems to have forgotten to get on the bus to the 21st century. The millions of assignments that are being submitted everyday in colleges throughout the country, remains to stick to the age old method of handwritten submissions. In the age of artificial intelligence, sticking on to this system of educational practices has been doing nothing in favour to the students but has instead created a lacklustre in shaping the young minds into careers that demand more. What companies seek today are smart, enthusiastic and digitally well versed candidates who would ensure quick delivery of progress. Yet, an alarming number of colleges, including the professional ones, still stick to norms that are not just outdated but have become ancient. The legal fraternity in the state of the most literate people, seems to be...